留学群专题频道GMAT逻辑反对题型解析栏目，提供与GMAT逻辑反对题型解析相关的所有资讯，希望我们所做的能让您感到满意！
08-15
GMAT逻辑试题中包含了一种反对思维，反对题型，很多同学可能对这种题型不太了解，下面就和留学群GMAT小编一起来看看《GMAT逻辑反对题型解析》，希望对你有所帮助。
小编提醒：GMAT考试逻辑试题反对题型的正确答案是放在论证推理和结论之间，使段落推理成立或结论正确的可能性降低的选项，即对段落推理的作用与支持题型中的刚好相反。GMAT考试在解答反对题型时很常见的一个错误是选择带有论证和结论中的关键词而答案本身却对结论无任何影响的选项。反对的选项比支持要灵活的多，只要是能削弱对所得出结论的支持即可。因此，正确答案可能并无论证和结论中的关键词，而那些带有关键词的选项就具有很大的迷惑性。我们通过以下这个例子来看看这种常见错误的表现形式和GMAT考试攻略。
A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people’s intentions as relevant to punishment. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?
(A) In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.
(B) In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated.
(C) Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children.
(D) The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories.
本G...
GMAT逻辑反对题型解析推荐访问
